Israel’s Weaponization of Water: An Urgent Call to Provide Full Access to Water Services in Gaza
Mohsen Nagheeby, Alistair Rieu-Clarke, Stephen McCaffrey, Raya Marina Stephan; Ana Elisa Cascão; Owen McIntyre, Alan Nicol, Alex Meland, Hussam Hussein, Francesca de Châtel, Rawia Tawfik, Cara Flowers, Emanuele Fantini, Fuad Bateh.
This might be my last email to you [… while] we [with my wife and my five kids] have been deprived completely from water, electricity and food […]. Please […] do whatever you can to stop the genocide […] [we] may not be the same colour as [you] but [we] are not ‘human animals’.
– A Palestinian academic living in Gaza.
The weaponization of water and its infrastructure has become increasingly evident in recent armed conflicts. These acts seriously threaten the lives of the civilian population, especially the most vulnerable groups, such as children. Two days after Hamas launched its attack, Israel imposed a “total” blockade and cut the water supplies into the already besieged Gaza Strip –home to approximately 2.3 million people. On 9 October, Yoav Gallant, the Israeli Defence Minister, announced “a complete siege on Gaza …. No electricity, no food, no water, no gas – it’s all closed”.
The people of Gaza are in terrible peril now and the blockage of water supplies only compounds the misery of the millions of civilians in Gaza. In this post, we join the call to both parties to stop the war, and seek to briefly highlight some notable implications of Israel’s act of water blockage. We refer our discussion to the relevant framework of international humanitarian law in relation to freshwater supplies, in particular the draft Geneva List of Principles on the Protection of Water Infrastructure that sets out international rules that are applicable during armed conflicts and makes valuable recommendations. We urgently call for solidarity with all people on both sides of the war. Millions of defenceless people, including women and children in Gaza, face a deepening humanitarian crisis, a catastrophic chain of events, and a lack of the most basic human needs – water and food.
Even in times of conflict, States are obligated to protect the fundamental rights of civilians by prohibiting the use of water as a means of warfare, and respecting water as a fundamental human right.
A prohibition of the use of water as a means of warfare
The International Law Association in the Madrid Rules of 1976 addressed the use of water infrastructure, and water itself, in the context of armed conflict. Article III sets forth specific prohibition for the protection of the civilian population and the environment:
“The diversion of waters for military purposes should be prohibited when it would cause disproportionate suffering to the civilian population or substantial damage to the ecological balance of the area concerned. A diversion that is carried out in order to damage or destroy the minimum conditions of survival of the civilian population or the basic ecological balance of the area concerned or in order to terrorize the population should be prohibited in any case.”
The following proposal during the drafting of the UN 1997 Watercourses Convention on the use of water and water infrastructure as means of warfare is applicable in this case:
“Withholding, by diversion or other means, of water from a system State so as to place in jeopardy the survival of the civilian population or to imperil the viability of the environment is prohibited in peacetime and in time of armed conflict.”
Article 29 of the Watercourses Convention also applies:
“International watercourses and related installations, facilities and other works shall enjoy the protection accorded by the principles and rules of international law applicable in international and non-international armed conflict and shall not be used in violation of those principles and rules.”
More recently, the 2019 Geneva List of Principles on the Protection of Water Infrastructure has restated the obligation upon States to, “refrain from using water infrastructure and water-related infrastructure as a means of warfare”.
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has confirmed that water has now become a “matter of life and death” for people in Gaza. While Israel’s act of water blockage has no direct ‘military purpose’, it is, as announced by Israeli military authorities, seen as a military tactic to put in “jeopardy the survival of the civilian population”, and to put pressure on people in Gaza. It is therefore unlawful.
Water is a fundamental human right
The human right to water requires that everyone should have “access to sufficient, safe, acceptable, physically accessible and affordable water for personal and domestic use” (UNGA Res 72/178 (29 January 2018), § 2.). All States are obliged to respect the human right to water through both positive and negative obligations. Under Articles 11(1) and 12(1) of the 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the human right to water is legally binding.
General Comment 15 – adopted in 2002 by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), which monitors the implementation of the ICESCR – declares that “the human right to water is indispensable for leading a life in human dignity. It is a prerequisite for the realization of other human rights”. The rights to water and sanitation are also included in other instruments, including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Convention on the Rights of the Child and Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
General Comment 15 by the CESCR clearly stated that States, in accordance with international humanitarian law, must refrain from “limiting access to, or destroying, water services and infrastructure as a punitive measure” during armed conflicts.
A shortage of water and lack of access to sanitation may cause or aggravate other devastating crises, such as malnutrition and spread of diseases. This means that depriving people of water and sanitation during armed conflict may violate other human rights, which in turn can affect vulnerable groups, such as women and children, disproportionately.
General Comment 15 also makes a link between the fulfilment of the right to water and the realization of the right to adequate food. Additional Protocol I, Art. 54(1) and Additional Protocol II, Art. 14 to the Geneva Conventions, specifically stipulate that the use of starvation of the civilian population as a method of warfare must be prohibited. This rule is part of customary international law. Starvation not only means “killing by deprivation of water and food”, but also the deprivation of any essential commodity or thing necessary for survival. Therefore, international humanitarian law prohibits the use of starvation of the civilian population both in international and non-international armed conflicts.
Under Art. 49(1) and Art. 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, such “acts of violence against the adversary, whether in offence or in defence” is disproportionate if it “may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.” The devastating effects of Israel’s water blockage to the civilian population in Gaza is unequivocally disproportionate. Furthermore, Israel, as the occupying power, is also obliged to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of Palestinians. The government of Israel’s act of cutting Gaza’s water, food, and electricity supplies is therefore in violation of its international law obligations, conventional and customary, under both international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
In addition to the violation of international humanitarian law and international human rights law, according to the Art. 85(3)(c) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, the illegal act of cutting water, food and power to civilians in Gaza raises significant questions relating to war crimes.
We call upon the government of Israel to respect its obligations under international law, to provide full access to water services to Gaza, and to refrain from targeting necessary water infrastructure and related personnel. We ask both parties to stop the war. As human beings we are all dependent on water for life. To remain human, we must do all we can to ensure the humanitarian access to water for all the people in Gaza. We call on the international community and on all States and relevant actors to join us in this call.
If you wish to support this appeal, contact Mohsen Nagheeby (Mohsen.Nagheeby@newcastle.ac.uk)
Supporters:
Mark Zeitoun
Shaddad Attili
Mufleh Alalaween
Rozemarijn ter Horst
Antti Rautavaara
Leo Heller
Muna Dajani
Giulio Castelli
Ele Jan Saaf
Saher Ayyad
David Chaquea Romero
Lyla Mehta
Suvi Sojamo
Bassem Abass
Ameer Naji
Markus Fittkow
Noemie Louvet
Mat Nashed
Susana Neto
Hüseyin Gündoğdu
Perihane Allam
Marko Keskinen
Kyungmee Kim
Nada Abdelwahab
Mehran Saleem
Hanadi Bader
Waseem Altamimi
Larry A. Swatuk
Isabela Espindola
Mehdi Fasihi
Anas Tallou
Intesar Razaq Hussain
Murtada Jumaa Hassan
Francesca Greco
Filippo Menga
Heather Elaydi
Mehrdad pouya
Shirin Motahareh Lotfaliani
Samia Jaheen
Delphine Magara
Rosario Sanchez
Fairouz Slama
Ayah Aman
Hussain Baga
Jeff Camkin
Fawzia Ammoura
Ghadeer Arafeh
John Jewers
Hichem Chenaker
Benjamin Schmidt
Serena Sandri
Lara khaled
Michelle Rudolph
Abdessamad Ghacha
Sam Bahour
Benjamin Schütze
Fariba Alamgir
Yomna ElSharony
Maysoon Zoubi
Kevin Wheeler
Edoardo Borgomeo
Sachin Tiwale
Wafaa abu Hammour
Nashwan Dhahir
Milad Jafari
Nooh Alshyab
Behnam Andik
Darius Borhan
Ain Contractor
Gül Özerol
Amin Shakya
Elizabeth Wambui Mwangi
Maureen Saldi
Mustafa Flaifel
Mohammad Awad
Gabriela Cuadrado-Quesada
Richard C Carter
Dona Geagea
Eyad Yaqob Ahmad Yaqob
Yasmin Zaerpoor
Raquel Matias
Mohammad Al-Saidi
Omama Y. Marzuq
Ines Dombrowsky
Mirja Schoderer
Annabelle Houdret
Jennife Dumalag-Borong
Michelle kooy
Mohammadnabi Jalali
Hojjat Mianabadi
Hanadi Al-Baz
Francesco Sindico
Jaime Amezaga
Ayat Alqudah
Isabel van Klink
Ayanna Jolivet Mccloud
Matteo Passeri
Elke Herrfahrdt
Sarah Bebb
Kata Molnar
Chadi Abdallah
Luiz Roberto Santos Moraes
Olivia Mason
Pani Haq Samiti
Murtah Shannon
Michelle LIM
Katharina Grüneisl
Joanna Allan
Jemima Repo
Ehsan Nabavi
Naho Mirumachi
Saker El Nour
Rachel Kurian
Natalija Vojno
Viviana Re
Palerm Jacinta
Farhad Mukhtarov
Zeray Yihdego
Somayeh G. Esfahani
Issufo Chutumia
Mohamed Mohieddin
Jonathan Coulter
Fadime Uzun
Marcela González Rivas
Muqaddas Tariq
Mishka Stuip
Carel Keuls
Rossella Alba
Samer Alatout
Mita Kusumaningrum
OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Mohsen Nagheeby (October 19, 2023). Israel’s Weaponization of Water: An Urgent Call to Provide Full Access to Water Services in Gaza. FLOWs. Retrieved December 9, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.58079/os34
Rachel Kurian
I support the appeal
Saker El Nour
Isabel van Klink
Everyone should have the right to clean water, and it’s wrong to use it to harm innocent people.
Ayat Alqudah
Water is a necessitie of life. We can not turn or back to people, whereas it be adults or children, sick or healthy, enemy or friend and see them denied water as a way of weaponization. Provide Gaza with water.
Water is a human right and it should not be used threaten the lives of innocent civilians!
Water and other basic services should not be used as a weapon. Power play and show of might should consider the suffering of civilians. There can not be sobriety if pride rides the day.
The article is good. Much appreciation for all the authors to put this together.
I have a good background in terms of using concepts and sometimes using sensitive words can impact the intentions that we are intended to do.
For me, the introduction really matters and how it was framed needs a little reconsidered:
1- The Armed conflict: if we add this big word in the introduction directly it refers back to the original history between Palestine and Israel as an armed conflict. My point here is that this is a very long occupational history and never started with armed from the Palestinian side (that never had an army). It needs a short background about the historical context in the region. For example, the Israel occupation started the colonization of Palestine in 1948.
2- The Hamas attack: this is what Western news is saying, and most of the readers don’t know what happened for 75 years, they will think that the two populations were living in peace, and all of a sudden Hamas launched its attacks and then Israelis had to protect themselves. In fact, it is not like it has been ongoing since the years that Israel bombed Gaza, recently in May 2023.
I am aware that scientific writing should be neutral, however, how this was framed is not. Blaming Hamas for everything but trying to help the Civilians of Gaza is a good intention however missing the point of actually helping.
Well said!
Gül Özerol
Although I do support the call to restore humanitarian supplies, including water, to the civilian population of Gaza, I am shocked by the neutral formulation “…. Hamas launched its attack”. You should have included the words: horrible terrorist attack, taking the lives of innocent people and taking hostages as well. By using those words you would have shown empathy for both sides. Reading your legal approach, you are probably right from that point of view, but I feel a cold wind.
See also: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-10-15/ty-article/.premium/israeli-leftist-academics-call-out-political-allies-for-tolerating-hamas/0000018b-34f5-da5e-abef-bdf572610000
It should be noted to readers that the water problem did not only arise after the “Hamas attack” but rather this is ONE of the reasons that Hamas launched the attack in the first place. This water problem has been going on for years because water is controlled solely by Israel.
If Hamas is referred to as a terrorist than the opposite side is what? They have been terrorizing men, women and children for decades. Does the media you read, write about this? There are children in prisons! This is all before the Hamas attack. Did you know that so many Palestinian wells, especially farmers where they live off their land, are filled with cement so they become disconnected from the grid and unable to survive? This is a common practice where soldiers just laugh with pride after committing such acts. This is their way of telling them to leave. But the media censors all this and has now all of a sudden focused on Hamas being a terrorist and everyone else gets a golden pass for their inhuman acts that have gone on for years before the “Hamas’ attack”.
Please I ask, do not believe everything you read. The hospitals were not Hamas. The church was not Hamas. Aid is not simply going in now…where the headline makes it sound like a good thing, only 20 trucks went in… that is 1 truck for every 100,000 persons who already are cut off from basic necessities, who are sleeping on the streets with their bloody clothes and dusty bodies that they cannot wash due to lack of water. Yet all these acts are forgotten and media keeps mentioning the day Hamas attacked. It is truly inhumane and sad. Please remember that media is very very misleading. If you have an open mind, turn on Al Jazeera in English and compare. Al Jazeera which is currently getting threats to leave. Al Jazeera who just the other day had a reporter shot down by the Israeli forces. Is this just? If they are not doing anything wrong, what are they hiding, why are they behaving this way? I am not pro war but finally due to Hamas’ attack (which consisted of small rockets only and taking hostages in and treating them well) Palestinians are now being heard. Hamas wanted to release two hostages yesterday, but the Israeli government said no. Why? How come? They filled the media with Hamas has hostages, look how evil they are.
Apologies for this reply, I don’t mean to argue but please try to read the unbiased media.
Water should definitely not be weaponized!
Michelle Rudolph
Count me in for the support, how to support??
Thanks for your support. your name was added. Please share it in your network.
These acts seriously threaten the lives of the civilian
There is no excuse to deny people water. None.
I want to sign the call
Water should definitely not be weaponized!
Free Gaza
Provide Gaza with water
Lara khaled
Yes water shouldn’t be weaponised under any circumstances.